Responsa for Bava Kamma 229:12

רב פפא אמר בגלימא דכ"ע לא פליגי דהדר למריה והכא בעשו בו תקנת השוק קמיפלגי

maintained that it was only Renunciation followed by a change of possession that transfers ownership,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To the last possessor, I.e. the purchaser. ');">²¹</span> whereas if the change of ownership has preceded Renunciation<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As was the case here where the Renunciation took place when the articles were already in the hands of the purchaser. ');">²²</span>

Explore responsa for Bava Kamma 229:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.